

"The antique as souvenir always bears the burden of nostalgia for experience impossibly distant in time: the experience of the family, the village, the firsthand community. One can better understand the antique's stake in the creation of an intimate distance if the antique is contrasted to the physical relic, the souvenir of the dead which is the mere material remains of what had possessed human significance. Because they are souvenirs of death, the relic, the hunting trophy, and the scalp are at the same time the most intensely
potential souvenirs and the most potent antisouvenirs. They mark the horrible transformation of meaning into materially more than they mark, as other souvenirs do, the transformation of materiality into meaning. If the function of the souvenir proper is to create a continuous and personal function of the souvenir proper is to create a continuous and personal narrative of the past, the function of such souvenirs of death is to disrupt and disclaim that continuity. Souvenirs of the mortal body are not so much a nostalgic celebration of the past as they are an erasure of the significance of history. Consider the function of such souvenirs in the contagious and malevolent magic of voodoo. Or consider the enormous display of hunting trophies staged as "The International Competitive Show" by Hermann Goring in 1937 as a premonition of the death camps and their attempted negation of meaning. In contrast to the restoration offered by such gestures as the return of saints' relics, these souvenirs mark the end of sacred narrative and the interjection of the curse. Ironically, such phenomena themselves can later be reframed in an ensuing metonymic displacement such as the punk and kitsch appropriations of fascist material culture."
Stewart, Susan. "Chapter 5, Part 1." On Longing: Narratives of the Miniature, the Gigantic, the Souvenir, the Collection. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins UP, 1984. 140. Print.
I have only posted one quotation because it is such a long one and says so much. The only issue I have with this quote is that I am not sure what the last sentence is saying exactly. I am going to start with the "souvenir of the dead". The reason that I am starting with the dead souvenir is because I have come across a lot of carcasses in the houses that I am photographing. These carcasses are mostly of birds of which I assume had found their way into the houses but could not get back out and for lack of food died in the house. I have also seen deer, cat, and dog remnants. One thing that Stewart has said about these souvenirs if that they are here to stop the story of the past. In a way the houses themselves could be looked at as dead and also the items that are decaying inside. This really hit home for me since all I really wanted to do was find the history of the houses and the people that lived there. Maybe this is a way of something telling me that that past has been interrupted and have "erased the significance of history". This in another way could be my opportunity to bring back the "significance of the history" of these houses.
Bibliography:
Stewart, Susan. On Longing: Narratives of the Miniature, the Gigantic, the Souvenir, the Collection. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins UP, 1984. Print.